Prenatal exposure to antibiotics and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and purpose A growing body of research suggests that inflammation and maternal infections may lead to an increased risk of neurodevelopmental problems such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy (CP), and epilepsy in offspring. The aim of this study was to observe the connection between prenatal antibiotic exposure and the risk of these neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. Patients and methods A comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for observational studies that looked into the link between prenatal exposure to antibiotics and the risk of neurodevelopmental problems in offspring, published from 1 January 1950 to 31 January 2022. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Data were analyzed using the STATA version 12 software, and an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported. Results A total of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with the increased risk of ADHD (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.15; I2 = 0%) and epilepsy (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.66; I2 = 96.8%). The link between prenatal antibiotic exposure and the risk of ASD [OR = 1.09; 95 % CI = 0.88 to 1.31; I2 = 78.9%] and CP [OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.43; I2 = 91%] was found to be non-significant. In all of the included prospective cohort studies, subgroup analysis suggested a significant association between prenatal antibiotic exposure and the incidence of ASD [OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.31; I2 = 48.1%] and CP [OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.34; I2 = 0%]. Conclusion Prenatal antibiotic exposure during pregnancy is linked to a higher incidence of ADHD and epilepsy in the offspring. Further prospective studies that compare prenatal antibiotic use and are adjusted for various confounders are needed to further assess the association of prenatal antibiotic exposure and neurological disorders in offspring. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier: CRD42022306248.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.036 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".