MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A SMALL WINDOW INTO A LARGER WORLD: INLAND PORTS, TRADE, AND STATE-BUILDING IN URUGUAY (1860-1918)

2022· article· en· W4310045840 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Henz Biasetto

Bibliographic record

VenueIlles i imperis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrivingGlobalizationState (computer science)International tradeWindow (computing)Window of opportunityEconomyPolitical scienceGeographyBusinessEconomicsEngineeringSociologyComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper intends to analyze the role of inland ports and waterways in Uruguay from 1860until 1918. The main idea is to understand how the country’s ports have shaped its economiclife during what has been called «The First Age of Globalization». During these years ofpolitical turmoil, the process of state-building in Uruguay was intrinsically connected to itsability to trade with its neighbors and European allies. Therefore, the maritime trade analysisin the South Atlantic Ocean and Uruguay’s place can reveal how the country establisheditself as an independent state and a thriving trade economy by the early 20th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIlles i imperisSame topicEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207