Blockchain-Based Data Sharing With Key Update for Future Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future networks incorporate artificial intelligence to enable smart resource management and adaptive service provisioning. With a heterogeneous architecture and a large number of users in future networks, transparent and decentralized data sharing is required to promote data circulation and break data silos, for which blockchain is a potential solution to allow intelligent access permission control. However, it remains a challenging task to achieve flexible authorization management for blockchain-based data sharing and efficient key update for multi-users in case of key exposure. In this paper, we propose an intelligent blockchain-based data-sharing scheme with key update for future networks. First, we design a new encryption scheme, where keywords of data are extracted using machine learning algorithms that are published on the blockchain. Then, keywords of data and time validity are used to encrypt different types of data for flexible data authorization. Second, using hierarchical identity-based encryption, we construct an efficient key update mechanism, where update tokens are generated by invoking a smart contract deployed on the blockchain to facilitate key and ciphertext updates. We formally prove that the proposed scheme can guarantee three essential security properties: forward security, post-compromise security, and collusion attack resistance. On-chain and off-chain experiment results are provided to demonstrate that the proposed scheme can achieve computational and communication efficiency for key and ciphertext updates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".