Blockchain-Based Data Sharing With Key Update for Future Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future networks incorporate artificial intelligence to enable smart resource management and adaptive service provisioning. With a heterogeneous architecture and a large number of users in future networks, transparent and decentralized data sharing is required to promote data circulation and break data silos, for which blockchain is a potential solution to allow intelligent access permission control. However, it remains a challenging task to achieve flexible authorization management for blockchain-based data sharing and efficient key update for multi-users in case of key exposure. In this paper, we propose an intelligent blockchain-based data-sharing scheme with key update for future networks. First, we design a new encryption scheme, where keywords of data are extracted using machine learning algorithms that are published on the blockchain. Then, keywords of data and time validity are used to encrypt different types of data for flexible data authorization. Second, using hierarchical identity-based encryption, we construct an efficient key update mechanism, where update tokens are generated by invoking a smart contract deployed on the blockchain to facilitate key and ciphertext updates. We formally prove that the proposed scheme can guarantee three essential security properties: forward security, post-compromise security, and collusion attack resistance. On-chain and off-chain experiment results are provided to demonstrate that the proposed scheme can achieve computational and communication efficiency for key and ciphertext updates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it