MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310096775 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-168374

Proteomic Profiles of Cytokine Release Syndromes Following Lisocabtagene Maraleucel and Idecabtagene Vicleucel

2022· article· en· W4310096775 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abu‐Sayeef Mirza, Alexander B. Pine, Yusuf Rasheed, Ramzi Hamouche, Etienne Léveillé, George Goshua, Sean X. Gu, Yuxin Liu, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Noffar Bar, Natalia Neparidze, Francine M. Foss, Lohith Gowda, Iris Isufi, Stephanie Halene, Alfred Ian Lee, Stuart Seropian

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokineImmunologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells has improved responses in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM). Most CAR-T recipients experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) - similar yet clinically distinct inflammatory syndromes related to T-cell activation and expansion of multiple cytokines. Differences in tumor biology between MM and DLBCL and how they contribute to differences in cytokine expression is not well understood. Given different CAR T-cell constructs have varying levels of activation and toxicity, cytokine profiles between products and between different disease entities may inform management. In this study, we used multiplex proteomic profiling to evaluate differences in plasma cytokine signatures between two CAR T-cell products and diseases. Methods: Between September 2021 and March 2022, 20 patients received CAR T-cell therapy and consented to the Yale School of Medicine hematologic disease tissue bank (HIC#1401013259). Two longitudinal cohorts were prospectively enrolled: (1) patients who received lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) for DLBCL refractory after two lines of therapy, and (2) those who received idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) for MM refractory after 4 lines of therapy. For each patient, the first sample was collected prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy on day -5 with subsequent samples collected on days 0 (prior to CAR T-cell infusion) and 1, 2, 3, and 7 (after CAR T-cell infusion). Plasma samples were processed and frozen within 1 hour of collection. Proteomic profiling was performed at Eve Technologies (Calgary, Alberta, Canada). The Human 71-Plex Discovery Assay measuring 71 total cytokines and chemokines was used to interrogate each sample time point. Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and R (R Core Team). Levels of individual proteins were compared using Wilcoxon tests. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Among 13 patients who received liso-cel for DLBCL (including 2 with transformed follicular lymphoma and 3 with double/triple hit pathology), the median age was 66 years (44-82), 7 (54%) were males, 8 (62%) had KPS ≥ 90, 8 (62%) had bulky disease, median lines of therapy were 4 (2-10), and 11 (85%) received systemic bridging therapy. Seven patients (54%) had any grade CRS, with one patient having grade 3 CRS; 2 (15%) had grade 1 and 2 ICANS. Four patients (31%) received an IL-6 inhibitor. At 3 months of follow-up, the objective response rate was 77% (10/13), of whom two patients had a complete response and 60% (6/10) had any grade CRS. Among 7 patients who received ide-cel for MM, with R-ISS score of 1, 2, and 3 in 4 (57%), 1 (14%), and 2 (29%) patients, respectively, the median age was 61 years (54-79), 5 (71%) were males, 4 (57%) had KPS ≥ 90, 3 (43%) had extramedullary disease, median lines of therapy were 7 (4-13), and 5 patients (71%) received systemic bridging therapy. Six patients (86%) had any grade CRS with no patients having grade ≥ 3 CRS; 3 (43%) had grade 1 ICANS. Four patients (57%) received an IL-6 inhibitor. Five patients (63%) received growth factor support on day 7. At 3 months of follow-up, the objective response rate was 86% (6/7) of whom two patients had a complete response and 83% (5/6) had any grade CRS. In a longitudinal analysis, significantly higher levels of IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-15, IL-309, and TNFα were noted during CRS (panel 1). In a comparison between CAR constructs, ide-cel was characterized by significantly higher levels of Eotaxin-2, FLT-3L, IL-5, IL-6, IL-15, I-309, MCP-1, and MCP-4 compared to liso-cel (panel 2). Many of these elevated cytokine proteins are implicated as chemoattractants for other leukocyte subtypes including but not limited to neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils which may contribute to inflammation and may modulate response, toxicity, or relapse. Conclusions: Ide-cel is associated with a distinct cytokine and chemokine signature compared to liso-cel. This study provides pre-clinical evidence for the role of IL-5 inhibitors to treat or prevent CRS following MM-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Further studies with larger cohorts of patients are needed to validate these findings. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207