MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310104934 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-168060

Gonadal Hormone Production after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD): A Stellar Study

2022· article· en· W4310104934 on OpenAlexaff
Sobenna A. George, Anirudh Veludhandi, Yijin Xiang, Elizabeth Stenger, Staci D. Arnold, Akanksha Mehta, David A. Schirmer, Jessica B. Spencer, Gregory M.T. Guilcher, Monica Bhatia, Allistair Abraham, Veronica Gomez‐Lobo, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti, Lillian R. Meacham

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangeMedicineQuartileTestosterone (patch)MenarcheInternal medicineTransplantationOvarian reserveHormoneFollicle-stimulating hormoneHematopoietic stem cell transplantationLuteinizing hormoneEndocrinologyPregnancyInfertilityBiologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction HCT is the only therapy for SCD with curative intent, but the alkylator chemotherapies used in preparative regimens place patients at high risk for gonadal dysfunction. Adequate ovarian and testicular hormone production post-HCT is important for optimal health. Methods We enrolled children and adults with SCD ≥ 1-year post-HCT ("HCT") in the Sickle Cell Transplant Evaluation of Long-term and Late Effects Registry (STELLAR) and a control group of patients with SCD not treated with HCT ("non-HCT"). We obtained annual surveys of gonadal health using a web-based platform. Surveys were completed by proxies for individuals <18 years and were self-report for individuals ≥18 years. Markers of ovarian reserve or testicular function were measured, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in females and FSH and testosterone in males. The most recent survey was used for analysis when multiple surveys were available. The upper limit of normal (ULN) for age of pubertal onset was defined as 13 years in females and 14 in males, and the ULN for menarche was 15 years. Only females >13 years and males >14 years (ULN for activation of the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis) were included in the FSH analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported as median (Interquartile range [IQR]: 3rd quartile - 1st quartile), mean (min, max) or count (%). Statistical procedures involved a chi-squared test. The effect size was calculated using standard mean difference (SMD). Results Surveys were completed by 48 SCD HCT patients (30 females, 18 males) and 12 SCD control patients (8 females, 4 males). Median age (IQR) at survey completion was 14.8 years (11.8) for female HCT, 16.0 (10.4) for male HCT, 14.5 (11.6) for female non-HCT, and 21.0 (22.8) for male non-HCT. Median age (IQR) at HCT was 8.8 years (6.1) for females and 9.1 years (5.2) for males. Most patients underwent HCT in 2010-2020 (86.7% of females, 78.8% of males). Donor was predominantly matched related (90.0% of females, 94.4% of males) with bone marrow stem cell source (90.0% of females, 94.4% of males). Most patients received myeloablative conditioning (86.7% of females, 94.4% of males). Only female HCT patients (n=8, 32%) reported being told they might need hormones to enter puberty. In females who were ≥15 years, menarche was reported in 11 (78.6%) HCT and all of the non-HCT patients. Current menstruation was reported in 9 (64.3%) HCT and 3 (75.0%) of non-HCT patients, and 10 (71.4%) HCT and 1 (25%) non-HCT females reported ever having taken hormones, including birth control. P-values and SMD can be seen in Table 1. Hormone levels were measured in 68 HCT patients (41 female, 27 male). Most patients underwent HCT from 2010-2020 (82.9% of females; 74.1% of males) using matched related donor (90.2% of females, 92.6% of males) bone marrow (87.8% of females, 85.2% of males) following myeloablative conditioning (87.8% of females, 88.9% of males). For females, the median age at the time of AMH testing was 16.5 years (IQR 9.1) with a mean of 6.8 years (IQR 4.8) post-HCT. Based on the age and assay normal values, AMH levels were normal in 3 (7.3%), low but detectable in 7 (17.1%), and undetectable in 31 (75.6%) of patients. FSH was measured in 12 females who were >13 years and not on hormone therapy (Table 2). The median age at FSH testing was 18.0 years (IQR 5.1), with a mean of 8.7 years (IQR 3.5) post-HCT. FSH levels were normal in 7 (58.3%) and above the ULN in 5 (41.7%), 3 of which were menopausal (>30mIU/mL). Testosterone values were obtained in 15 males who were >14 years with a median age 18.9 years (IQR 5.9) and a mean of 6.9 years (IQR 5.1) post-HCT. The mean testosterone level was 365.8 ng/dl (range 152-592), 13 (86.7%) of which were in the normal range and 2 (13.3%) being low. FSH values in males >14 years were high in 4 (26.7%). Conclusions Nearly all females had diminished ovarian reserve post-HCT, with >75% having undetectable AMH levels. In addition, close to half of the females had elevated FSH levels, some in the menopausal range. However, females with normal FSH and normal or low AMH can consider post-HCT mature oocyte cryopreservation. Most males had normal testosterone levels, but >25% had elevated FSH levels which could be a signal of impaired spermatogenesis. These findings highlight the importance of studying the impact of HCT on gonadal function and the consideration of these outcomes when developing protocols for curative therapy in SCD. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→