MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310107925 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-168586

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified (PTCL-NOS) and T-Follicular Helper T-Cell Lymphoma (TFHTCL) Treated with Curative Intent CHOP(like) Chemotherapy

2022· article· en· W4310107925 on OpenAlexaff
Henry S. Ngu, Diego Villa, Alina S. Gerrie, Christopher P. Venner, Andrew Lytle, Brian Skinnider, Jeffrey W. Craig, Graham W. Slack, David W. Scott, Laurie H. Sehn, Kerry J. Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphomaFollicular lymphomaInternal medicineNot Otherwise SpecifiedOncologyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) remains the standard treatment for older adults with non-anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). However, recent studies suggest that patients (pts) > 75 years (y) have similar outcomes with CHOP compared to those receiving palliative regimens (Ellin et al. Hematological Oncology 2017). In addition, with studies demonstrating sensitivity of PTCLs to epigenetic therapies, especially in the T-follicular helper (TFH) subtypes, there are emerging clinical trials evaluating these agents in newly diagnosed PTCL patients > 60 y (NCT02232516). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of pts aged 65 y or older with PTCLs, a group generally not transplant eligible, treated with systemic therapy with a focus on those treated with curative intent CHOP(like) chemotherapy. Methods The BC Cancer Lymphoid Cancer Database was reviewed and pts > 65 years with PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) as well as other T-Follicular Helper PTCL (collectively referred to as TFH T-cell lymphoma [TFHTCL]) diagnosed between 2000-2021 and who received front-line chemotherapy were included. Diagnoses were based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of 2001, 2008, and 2017, depending on the era of diagnosis. Time to progression (TTP) was measured from the date of pathologic diagnosis to the date of relapse/progression, death due to treatment toxicity or lymphoma. Results 152 pts were initially identified, of which 5 were excluded: stage IA/IAE (n=3); CNS involvement only (n=2). Of the remaining 147 pts, 67 (46%) had PTCL-NOS and 80 (54%) had TFHTCL. The median age was 74 y (range 65-90) and the majority of pts had high risk features: International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of > 3 (n=113, 76%), stage III/IV disease (n=136, 93%) and PS of > 2 (n=85, 58%). Most pts (n=127, 86%) received multi-agent chemotherapy with curative intent. All pts received CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy (including five pts treated with CHP-brentuximab vedotin)Over half of these patients (n=66, 52%) received attenuated doses of chemotherapy starting from cycle 1, typically 50-75% dose intensity. Only two patients received consolidative autologous stem cell transplant. The remaining 20 patients received chemotherapy with palliative treatment intent, the majority (n=18, 90%) receiving cyclophosphamide alone or with the CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen. The median follow-up of all pts using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method was 9.2 y (range 0.9 to 12.5). The estimated 5-y TTP and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 21%, and 26%, respectively. Outcomes were similar in PTCL-NOS and TFHTCL (5-y TTP 17% vs 25%; p = 0.26). Curative intent chemotherapy was used more frequently in the 65-74 y vs > 75 y age group (70% vs 36%, p = 0.004). As expected, outcomes were superior in those treated with curative intent (Table 1): Median TTP of 11.3 months (m) vs 3.0 m; median OS of 24 m vs 4.5 m. Improvements in TTP and OS extended to those > 75 y (p < 0.001 for both). Considering the curative intent cohort, 91% of the relapse/progression events occurred within the first 3 y, and there was no significant difference in outcomes (5-y TTP/OS) with increasing age: 65-75 (19%/25%), >75 (34%/35%) (p = 0.08/0.6). Further, the outcomes of pts who received attenuated doses of CHOP-like chemotherapy were not inferior compared to full dose chemotherapy (5-y TTP/OS 32%/37% vs. 17%/21% p= 0.2/0.3). 5-y TTP/OS by the IPI ranged from 30%/52% for IPI of 1-2 to 12%/14% for IPI 4-5. The prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) was more effective at identifying a lower risk group: 5-y TTP/ OS (PIT 1 40%/57%; PIT 2 21%/28%; PIT 3 21%/20% PIT 4 9%/10%, p = 0.002/0.001). Both models were prognostic in PTCL-NOS and TFHTCL. (Table 1) Conclusion With mature follow-up, ~ 30% of all older pts treated with curative intent CHOP-like chemotherapy remain progression-free and are alive at 5 y. Although results remain suboptimal, robust older patients can still be considered for curative intent CHOP chemotherapy with tailored doses to mitigate toxicity. Those with low risk IPI/PIT scores have a more favourable outcome with this approach, with a 5-y OS of > 50%, suggesting a benefit of subsequent therapies. In contrast, higher risk disease have poor outcomes and novel therapeutic approaches should be considered. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→