MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resenha crítica: você disse autonomia? uma breve percepção da experiência das crianças

2022· article· pt· W4310110442 on OpenAlexaff
Rayanne Lopes Almeida Fonteles

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta resenha crítica foi realizada a partir de uma perspectiva sistêmica, do texto “Você disse autonomia? Uma breve percepção da experiência das crianças”, dos autores Cléopâtre Montandon e Philippe Longchamp. O objetivo da presente resenha é refletir sobre o tema da autonomia de crianças, especialmente, no contexto escolar. Dessa forma, procura-se responder à seguinte pergunta: como a autonomia de crianças no ambiente escolar pode ser pensada numa perspectiva sistêmica? Reflete-se que o microssistema escolar é um contexto de desenvolvimento humano e, como tal, deve desenvolver um trabalho articulado com a família e a comunidade, configurando um mesossistema fortalecido no qual favorece a ampliação da autonomia da criança.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do ConhecimentoSame topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207