MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310112939 · doi:10.15273/hpj.v2i2.11463

About the Cover: The Breakfast and Beyond Program: A Trainee's Experience

2022· article· en· W4310112939 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachel Waugh

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthy Populations Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthMount Saint Vincent UniversityWorld Health Organization
KeywordsSAINTMountMedical educationCover (algebra)PsychologyPerceptionGerontologyPedagogyMedicineNursingSociologyHistoryEngineeringArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About the author: Rachel is a Registered Dietitian (RD) and a student in the Master of Science in Applied Human Nutrition (MScAHN) program at Mount Saint Vincent University. Her graduate thesis is a mixed-form questionnaire exploring Canadian RDs’ experiences, perceptions, and knowledge of weight-related evidence in practice, framed by the Nutrition Care Process. Outside of her studies, Rachel loves to cook, try new foods, spend time with her dog, and visit her family in New Brunswick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthy Populations JournalSame topicDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationFrench-language works237,207