MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310112939 · doi:10.15273/hpj.v2i2.11463

About the Cover: The Breakfast and Beyond Program: A Trainee's Experience

2022· article· en· W4310112939 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachel Waugh

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthy Populations Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthMount Saint Vincent UniversityWorld Health Organization
KeywordsSAINTMountMedical educationCover (algebra)PsychologyPerceptionGerontologyPedagogyMedicineNursingSociologyHistoryEngineeringArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About the author: Rachel is a Registered Dietitian (RD) and a student in the Master of Science in Applied Human Nutrition (MScAHN) program at Mount Saint Vincent University. Her graduate thesis is a mixed-form questionnaire exploring Canadian RDs’ experiences, perceptions, and knowledge of weight-related evidence in practice, framed by the Nutrition Care Process. Outside of her studies, Rachel loves to cook, try new foods, spend time with her dog, and visit her family in New Brunswick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthy Populations JournalSame topicDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationFrench-language works237,207