MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310130519 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03246

Optimization of Electrical, Dielectric, and Electromagnetic Response in Nanocomposite Foam by Balancing Carbon Nanotube Restricted Orientation and Selective Distribution

2022· article· en· W4310130519 on OpenAlexaff
Bihui Jin, Bowen Zhang, Haoyu Ma, Xutao Zhang, Pengjian Gong, Yanhua Niu, Chul B. Park, Guangxian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectromagnetic wave absorption materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectState Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials EngineeringMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNanocompositeCarbon nanotubeMaterials scienceComposite materialElectrical conductorDielectricVolume fractionPolarization (electrochemistry)NanotubeAspect ratio (aeronautics)NanotechnologyOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In nanocomposite foams, one-dimensional (1D) carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with large length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios are selectively distributed in two-dimensional (2D) cell walls, featured as restricted distribution state of limiting in the cell-wall thickness direction and orienting in the cell-wall stretching direction. Such a unique CNT distribution state in nanocomposite foam significantly affects the degree of interface polarization for CNTs, conductive network construction, and electromagnetic (EM) wave interaction, hence determining the dielectric, conductive, and EM absorbing performance of the foams. Based on experiment and simulation results, the underlying synergistic interaction between CNTs and cells in nanocomposite foam is uncovered: (1) CNTs selectively distributed in polymer matrix isolated by cells (that is, the cell wall), and, hence, better dielectric, conductive, and EM absorbing performance were obtained at lower CNT volume content; (2) the 1D structure of CNTs is favorable for contacting with each other, but also leads to restricted orientation in the 2D cell walls (hence, there is an optimum CNT distribution in nanocomposite foam to optimize the corresponding performance). It was observed that larger CNT L/D ratios, easier to construct response networks, but larger CNTs restrict the degree to which the corresponding network construction is suppressed in cell walls. This optimum L/D ratio shifts to lower values as the CNT volume content in nanocomposite foam increases. Therefore, an appropriate cellular structure, CNT L/D ratio, and volume content are the prerequisites to maximize the advantages of CNT selective distribution and an easy-to-contact 1D structure, and to minimize the disadvantage of cell-wall-restricted CNT distribution, to construct optimum dielectric, conductive, and EM-absorbing networks for better corresponding performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicElectromagnetic wave absorption materialsFrench-language works237,207