MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310148868 · doi:10.3390/civileng3040059

Yield Characteristics of Cemented Paste Backfill

2022· article· en· W4310148868 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Pan, Murray Grabinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueCivilEng · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPortland State University
KeywordsCohesion (chemistry)Geotechnical engineeringSofteningStrain hardening exponentHardening (computing)Materials scienceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cemented paste backfill (CPB) plays an increasingly important role in the mining industry due to its operational and environmental benefits. CPB is placed in the mined-out stope to form a self-supporting structure. The strength and stability of the CPB is of great concern in its engineering applications. Indeed, CPB must remain stable during the extraction of adjacent stopes to ensure the safety of the mine operations. Although significant research has been conducted on the shear properties of CPB, there are limited studies on its post-failure behavior, in particular the yield characteristics of CPB. This paper presents the finding on the post-peak and yield property of CPB. The study is conducted on three cemented contents and six stress intervals based on the mining practice and field study. The results show that CPB exhibits dilative behavior under strain softening and contractive property under strain hardening conditions. Our study demonstrates that pure frictional resistance could exceed the cohesion strength at high stress levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivilEngSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207