MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310150507 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21592356

New Self-Isolated MIMO Antenna Array for 5G mm-Wave Applications

2022· preprint· en· W4310150507 on OpenAlexaff
Oludayo Sokunbi, Hussein Attia, Hamza Abubakar, Atif Shamim, Yiyang Yu, Ahmed A. Kishk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOWidebandDecoupling (probability)Bandwidth (computing)Antenna arrayPhysicsElectronic engineeringAcousticsAntenna (radio)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a simple novel technique to self-isolate multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) antenna array elements for mm-wave applications is proposed. MIMO antenna arrays with inter-element separation of 0.2 mm (0.023λ at 35 GHz) and measured high isolation (>50 dB) are presented. Several rigorously optimized slots of different shapes, positions, and dimensions are etched on the radiating patch to enhance the inter-element isolation within 28-37.5 GHz impedance bandwidth. The surface current distributions, parametric analysis, and two MIMO array configurations are employed to validate the proposed self-isolation technique. The novel mm-wave antenna exhibits high impedance bandwidth (>29%), high isolation (>50dB), high efficiency (>90%), high gain (>9.5 dB), and low envelope correlation coefficient (<0.005) throughout the desired bandwidth. Two configurations of the MIMO antenna arrays are fabricated and measured to validate the simulation outcomes. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the presented design is the first to exhibit such wideband isolation improvement without any external decoupling structure at the mm-wave frequency range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207