MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310155402 · doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01953-2

The global biodiversity framework needs a robust action agenda

2022· letter· en· W4310155402 on OpenAlexaff
Sander Chan, Steffen Bauer, Michele M. Betsill, Frank Biermann, Idil Boran, Peter Bridgewater, Harriet Bulkeley, Mercedes M. C. Bustamente, Alexandra Deprez, Felix Dodds, Michael Hoffmann, Anna‐Katharina Hornidge, Pablo Imbach, Maria Ivanova, Alexandre C. Köberle, Marcel Kok, Shuaib Lwasa, Tiffany H. Morrison, Hans‐Otto Pörtner, Agus P. Sari, Stacy D. VanDeveer, Derek Vollmer, Oscar Widerberg, Nathalie Pettorelli

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Ecology & Evolution · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health ResearchYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversityAction (physics)BusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0130.012
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.1450.097
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Ecology & EvolutionSame topicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207