Clinical Outcomes in Fresh Versus Cryopreserved Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products in British Columbia: A Retrospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is a mainstay of treatment for hematologic malignancies such as acute leukemias and aggressive lymphomas. Conventionally, fresh donor hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) are used, but the COVID-19 pandemic forced many centres to switch to cryopreservation of HPC for alloHSCT. We aimed to compare the outcomes in alloHSCT patients who received cryo-HPC with a recent historical cohort of patients who received fresh-HPC at our centre. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on all adult patients who received a bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood alloHSCT in British Columbia between June 2017 and Jan 2022; cryo-HPCs were the predominant product used as of March 2020. CIBMTR criteria were used to define engraftment. Patients who died before 30 days post-alloHSCT were excluded from primary graft failure (GF) and GVHD analysis; those who died before 100 days post-alloHSCT or had primary GF were excluded from secondary GF and chronic GVHD analysis. Patients who were alive on the date of last follow-up (January 31, 2022) were censored. Statistical significance was calculated using the Chi square test for categorical variables and T-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for OS. Results A total of 271 alloHSCT procedures were included in the analysis, of which 134 received fresh-HPC and 137 cryo-HPC. The median age at the time of transplant was 54 years [IQR 46-64] in the fresh-HPC vs 59 [IQR 39-61] in the cryo-HPC group (p=0.02). Male recipients comprised 60% of both groups (p=1). There was no significant difference in primary diagnosis (p=0.17); AML was the most frequent indication (46% fresh-HPC vs 35% cryo-HPC), followed by ALL/LBL (20% vs 23%). Most patients were in CR1 (63% vs 53%, p=0.01). The median CD34+ cell count infused was 7x106/kg in the fresh and 6x106/kg in the cryo-HPC group (p=0.08). For the cryo-HPC, the median time from cell collection to cryopreservation was 33 hours [IQR 23, 55], with a median cell viability of 96% [IQR 95, 98]. Matched unrelated donor was the most common donor type, which comprised 75% alloHSCTs in the fresh-HPC and 54% in the cryo-HPC group (p<0.01). Bone marrow source was used for 8% and 5% of alloHSCTs in the fresh-HPC and cryo-HPC groups, respectively (p=0.10). Myeloablative condition was used in 78% fresh-HPC vs 72% cryo-HPC (p=0.31) and busulfan/fludarabine was the most common regimen (47% vs 58%, p=0.01). Most patients received GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine and methotrexate ± Thymoglobulin (96% in fresh HPC, 79% in cryo-HPC, p<0.01) The median follow-up was 16 months in fresh [IQR 10, 25] vs 10 months in the cryo-HPC group [IQR 5, 15] (p<0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group, and the 10-month OS was similar in both groups (79% fresh-HPC vs 78% cryo-HPC, p=0.74). There was no difference in OS between the groups in the patients with a diagnosis of acute leukemia (p=0.57). Relapse rates were similar (27% fresh-HPC vs 23% cryo-HPC, p=0.60) with a median time to relapse of 5 months [IQR 3, 12] vs 3 months [IQR 3, 7] respectively (p=0.07). 10-month non-relapse mortality was 16% in fresh-HPC vs 13% in the cryo-HPC group (Fig 1b, p=0.47). There were no significant differences in causes of death; disease relapse was the most common cause of death (51% fresh-HPC, 56% cryo-HPC). Median neutrophil engraftment was faster in patients receiving fresh-HPC at 18 days [IQR 15, 22] vs 20 [IQR 17, 23] with cryo-HPC (p<0.01). Median platelet engraftment was also faster for fresh-HPC with 19 days [IQR 16, 23] compared with 22 [IQR 18, 29] with cryo-HPC (p<0.01). There was 1 case of primary GF in the fresh-HPC compared to 5 in the cryo-HPC groups (p=0.07), and 4 cases of secondary GF when using fresh-HPC compared to 3 with cryo-HPC (p=0.46). The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 30% in fresh HPC and 23% in cryo-HPC (p=0.06). The preliminary incidence of chronic GVHD was 43% in fresh HPC vs 33% in cryo-HPC (p=0.01). Conclusion Cryo-HPC may have prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment compared to fresh-HPC as well as increased incidence of primary graft failure. There were no significant differences in OS, relapse or acute GVHD among patients receiving fresh vs cryo-HPC in our cohort. Chronic GVHD was more common with fresh-HPC, likely due to longer follow-up times. These findings are consistent with those reported in literature. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".