MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310161038 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-158011

Once Weekly Selinexor, Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone (XKd) in Triple Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2022· article· en· W4310161038 on OpenAlexaff
Gary J. Schiller, Sascha A. Tuchman, Natalie S. Callander, Muhamed Baljević, Adrianna C Rossi, Rami Kotb, Darrell White, Nizar J. Bahlis, Heather J. Sutherland, Sumit Madan, Richard LeBlanc, Christopher P. Venner, William Bensinger, Dane R. Van Domelen, Wenjun Zhang, Ohad S. Bentur, Brea Lipe

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontCancerCare ManitobaVancouver General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryDalhousie UniversityUniversity of AlbertaQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarfilzomibMedicineBortezomibDaratumumabTolerabilityRefractory (planetary science)RegimenDexamethasoneInternal medicinePopulationMultiple myelomaOncologyProteasome inhibitorPharmacologyAdverse effectBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite recent advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and becomes refractory to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD38 mAbs). The prognosis of patients with triple-class refractory MM (TCR MM) is poor because of limited alternate therapies. The increasing number of patients with TCR MM leaves an unmet need for effective treatments in this population. The oral exportin-1 inhibitor selinexor has a novel mechanism of action by blocking nuclear export, which leads to accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the nucleus and blockage of protein translation of oncogenes. Selinexor is indicated for treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in combination with either dexamethasone (Xd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (XVd). Approval of the QW regimen of selinexor, bortezomib and dexamethasone (XVd) was based on the BOSTON study (NCT03110562), in which 195 patients receiving XVd had a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 13.93 months vs 9.46 months in 207 patients who received twice-weekly Vd. Results from previous studies in RRMM (STOMP phase 1/2 Study NCT02343042; phase 1 Study NCT02199665) confirmed that a combination of QW Xd with another PI, carfilzomib, is associated with impressive efficacy, an overall response rate (ORR) of 78%, including in patients with TCR MM (ORR = 67%) and patients with carfilzomib-refractory MM (ORR = 62%). The long mPFS, extending over a year, including in TCR MM, indicates selinexor-containing regimens provide prolonged disease control with good tolerability. Based on those results, we investigated XKd in a subset of STOMP patients with TCR MM with the aim of further exploring the tolerability of XKd in this patient population. Methods: The STOMP study XKd arm enrolled patients ≥18 years of age with RRMM. Patients were administered the QW combination of oral selinexor (60-100 mg), dexamethasone 40 mg, and IV carfilzomib 56-70 mg/m2. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were used to assess safety and tolerability. Efficacy endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and time to response (TTR). Results: Of the 33 patients treated with XKd, 23 had triple-class treated (TCT) MM. Twelve had TCR MM, including 8 (66.7%) with high-risk cytogenetics del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or gain 1q. The median age of patients with TCR MM was 67 and the median number of previous lines of therapy was 4 (range, 2-8) (Table 1). The rate of TEAEs in the patients with TCR MM was comparable to rates in the full cohort and the TCT subgroup (Table 2). Common hematologic TEAEs included thrombocytopenia (83.3%) and anemia (58.3%). Non-hematologic AEs included nausea (100%), decreased appetite (58.3%), and fatigue (58.3%). All cases of fatigue and all but a single event of nausea and decreased appetite had a severity grade of ≤2, and these low grade TEAEs were largely reversible and manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. Two patients discontinued study treatment after 149 and 386 days due to TEAEs, specifically cardiac toxicity attributed to carfilzomib (56 mg/m2 QW). There were no deaths due to TEAEs. The ORR was 66.7% (95% CI, 34.9-90.1), including 5 (41.7%) very good partial responses and 1 (8.3%) complete response. Median DOR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 12.0-not estimable [NE]). Median PFS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 5.3-NE) and median OS was 33 months (95% CI, 20.4-NE). Median TTR was 1 month (95% CI, 0.9-NE). In TCT MM, results were similar with an ORR of 65.2% and median PFS of 14.3 months (95% CI 12.0-NE). Tolerability is evidenced by the duration of study treatment of more than 6 months in 58.3% of patients and median time to discontinuation of 7.1 months (95% CI 4.6-NE). The median weekly selinexor dose was 60.8 mg. Conclusions: Despite a small sample size, these results highlight the potential utility of XKd as a treatment regimen for patients with TCR MM. XKd was generally well tolerated in this patient population with a generally manageable AE profile and a median DOR of 12 months. These results compare favorably to that found in the MAMMOTH study, where patients previously treated with anti-CD38 mAbs who primarily had TCR MM experienced an ORR of 31% and mPFS of 3.4 months when treated with standard treatment regimens. Interestingly, in MAMMOTH, the best ORR (47%) and mPFS (5.7 months) were observed in patients treated with carfilzomib-alkylator combinations. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→