MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310204403 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202143019

A global view on star formation: The GLOSTAR Galactic plane survey

2022· article· en· W4310204403 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio A. Dzib, A. Y. Yang, J. S. Urquhart, S.-N. X. Medina, A. Brunthaler, K. M. Menten, F. Wyrowski, W. D. Cotton, R. Dokara, Gisela N. Ortiz-León, M. R. Rugel, H. Nguyen, Y. Gong, Arnab Chakraborty, H. Beuther, S. J. Billington, Carlos Carrasco‐González, T. Csengeri, P. Höfner, J. Ott, J. D. Pandian, Nirupam Roy, Vanessa Yanza

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstrophysicsStarsAngular resolution (graph drawing)MillimeterAstronomyAngular diameterStar formationPlanetary nebula

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Global View on Star Formation (GLOSTAR) survey we have used the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in its B-configuration to observe the part of the Galactic plane between longitudes of 28° and 36° and latitudes from −1° to +1° at the C -band (4–8 GHz). To reduce the contamination of extended sources that are not well recovered by our coverage of the ( u , υ )-plane, we discarded short baselines that are sensitive to emission on angular scales >4 ″ . The resulting radio continuum images have an angular resolution of 1. ″ 0 and a sensitivity of ~60 µJy beam −1 , making it the most sensitive radio survey covering a large area of the Galactic plane with this angular resolution. An automatic source extraction algorithm was used in combination with visual inspection to identify a total of 3325 radio sources. A total of 1457 radio sources are ≥7 σ and comprise our highly reliable catalog; 72 of these are grouped as 22 fragmented sources, for example, multiple components of an extended and resolved source To explore the nature of the cataloged radio sources, we searched for counterparts at millimeter and infrared wavelengths. Our classification attempts resulted in 93 H II region candidates, 104 radio stars, and 64 planetary nebulae, while it is suggested that most of the remaining radio sources are extragalactic sources. We investigated the spectral indices ( α , S v ∝ v α ) of radio sources classified as H II region candidates and found that many have negative values. This may imply that these radio sources represent young stellar objects that are members of the star clusters around the high-mass stars that excite the H II regions, but not these H II regions themselves. By comparing the peak flux densities from the GLOSTAR and CORNISH surveys, we have identified 49 variable radio sources, most of them with an unknown nature. Additionally, we provide a list of 1866 radio sources detected within 5 to 7 σ levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→