Metaficção Historiográfica em Desmundo, de Ana Miranda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste trabalho, analisa-se a relação estabelecida entre a História e a Literatura na obra Desmundo. O romance, uma metaficção historiográfica, reconta criticamente um momento histórico da colonização brasileira, mas pela voz dos esquecidos, nesse caso, de mulheres. O objetivo desse artigo é analisar a revisão crítica da história que é operada por meio da perspectiva da narradora-protagonista Oribela, ou seja, a partir da visão de uma figura “excêntrica”. Tendo em vista que apenas o ponto de vista dos portugueses foi apresentado oficialmente na História, a perspectiva de Oribela ajuda a “preencher” as lacunas deixadas pela história oficial. Deste modo, os discursos da narradora-protagonista Oribela ora reproduzem, ora entram em embate com os discursos oficiais, constituindo uma intertextualidade com os enunciados históricos, além de representarem outras vozes ideológicas, fato que edifica a sua própria narração.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".