MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310259063 · doi:10.1002/eqe.3775

Deep neural network‐based regional seismic loss assessment considering correlation between EDP residuals of building structures

2022· article· en· W4310259063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersKementerian Pendidikan
KeywordsResidualArtificial neural networkComputer scienceProcess (computing)Reliability (semiconductor)ModalSeismic riskData miningReliability engineeringEngineeringMachine learningAlgorithmCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Regional seismic loss assessment is essential for developing an emergency response plan in the event of an earthquake, which can reduce casualties and socioeconomic losses in an urban community. The uncertainties and correlations of structures’ engineering demand parameters (EDP) should be adequately considered to evaluate the community‐level seismic risk. Recently, the authors proposed an incremental dynamic analysis‐based method and regression‐based models to estimate the variances and correlations of residuals in EDP termed “EDP residuals.” The quantified uncertainties of the EDP residuals facilitate the accurate evaluation of the regional seismic performance. Still, the computational cost required in the estimation process makes its application a challenge. This study proposes two frameworks for regional seismic loss assessment based on deep neural networks (DNNs) to extend the applicability of EDP residual estimation and improve its accuracy. The first framework estimates the EDP residuals of buildings by combining the EDP residuals of various single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems through the modal combination rules. Three DNN models are constructed to predict the EDP residuals of SDOF systems. The second framework predicts the EDP residuals of buildings directly using two DNN models. The proposed frameworks are verified by numerical examples of regional seismic loss assessment, for which time history‐based “exact” solutions exist. The supporting source code, data, and trained models are available for download at https://github.com/TyongKim/EDP_residual . Highlights The importance of considering EDP residual correlation in seismic system reliability analysis is demonstrated. Two DNN‐based frameworks are developed to estimate EDP residuals of building structures. Modal combination rule is employed to utilize EDP residuals of SDOF systems representing structural modes. DNN models are constructed to predict EDP residuals of SDOF and MDOF systems. Accuracy and applicability of DNN‐based frameworks are successfully demonstrated by example of regional seismic loss assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it