SLIDE: Significant Latent Factor Interaction Discovery and Exploration across biological domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Modern multi-omic technologies can generate deep multi-scale profiles. However, differences in data modalities, multicollinearity of the data, and large numbers of irrelevant features make the analyses and integration of high-dimensional omic datasets challenging. Here, we present Significant Latent factor Interaction Discovery and Exploration (SLIDE), a first-in-class interpretable machine learning technique for identifying significant interacting latent factors underlying outcomes of interest from high-dimensional omic datasets. SLIDE makes no assumptions regarding data-generating mechanisms, comes with theoretical guarantees regarding identifiability of the latent factors/corresponding inference, outperforms/performs at least as well as state-of-the-art approaches in terms of prediction, and provides inference beyond prediction. Using SLIDE on scRNA-seq data from systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, we first uncovered significant interacting latent factors underlying SSc pathogenesis. In addition to accurately predicting SSc severity and outperforming existing benchmarks, SLIDE uncovered significant factors that included well-elucidated altered transcriptomic states in myeloid cells and fibroblasts, an intriguing keratinocyte-centric signature validated by protein staining, and a novel mechanism involving altered HLA signaling in myeloid cells, that has support in genetic data. SLIDE also worked well on spatial transcriptomic data and was able to accurately identify significant interacting latent factors underlying immune cell partitioning by 3D location within lymph nodes. Finally, SLIDE leveraged paired scRNA-seq and TCR-seq data to elucidate latent factors underlying extents of clonal expansion of CD4 T cells in a nonobese diabetic model of T1D. The latent factors uncovered by SLIDE included well-known activation markers, inhibitory receptors and intracellular regulators of receptor signaling, but also honed in on several novel naïve and memory states that standard analyses missed. Overall, SLIDE is a versatile engine for biological discovery from modern multi-omic datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".