MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310277652 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102718

Correction: The ARSACS disease protein sacsin controls lysosomal positioning and reformation by regulating microtubule dynamics

2022· erratum· en· W4310277652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vincent Francis, Walaa Alshafie, Rahul Kumar, Martine Girard, Bernard Brais, Peter S. McPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrotubuleFunction (biology)NeurodegenerationCell biologyBiologyChemistryDiseaseMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ARSACS disease protein sacsin controls lysosomal positioning and reformation by regulating microtubule dynamicsJournal of Biological ChemistryVol. 298Issue 9PreviewAutosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay is a fatal brain disorder featuring cerebellar neurodegeneration leading to spasticity and ataxia. This disease is caused by mutations in the SACS gene that encodes sacsin, a massive 4579-amino acid protein with multiple modular domains. However, molecular details of the function of sacsin are not clear. Here, using live cell imaging and biochemistry, we demonstrate that sacsin binds to microtubules and regulates microtubule dynamics. Loss of sacsin function in various cell types, including knockdown and KO primary neurons and patient fibroblasts, leads to alterations in lysosomal transport, positioning, function, and reformation following autophagy. Full-Text PDF Open Access The author list should read as follows: Vincent Francis1, Walaa Alshafie1, Rahul Kumar1, Martine Girard1, Eric Krochmalnek1, Bernard Brais1, Peter S. McPherson2 The author contributions should read as follows: Author contributions - V. F., B. B., and P. S. M. conceptualization; V. F. and P. S. M. methodology; V. F. and P. S. M. writing–original draft; V. F., W. A., R. K., and M. G. visualization; V. F., W. A., R. K., M. G. and E.K. investigation; V. F., W. A., R. K., and M. G. validation; B. B. and P. S. M. supervision; V. F. and P. S. M. writing–review and editing; R. K. software; V. F. and P. S. M. data curation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicCellular transport and secretion→French-language works237,207→