MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310355942 · doi:10.16995/jer.9016

Branching Songs

2022· article· en· W4310355942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Embodied Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityEmily Carr University of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundscapeAmbisonicsVisual artsBranching (polymer chemistry)Tree (set theory)ImprovisationComputer scienceGeographySound (geography)EcologyArtGeologyAcousticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cities, trees are seen predominantly as entities that beautify streets, parks and gardens. Often they’re regarded as obstacles to urban development, where their importance to ecosystem health plays a secondary role to economic growth. How can multispecies art offer new perspectives on trees and their crucial contributions to urban life? Branching Songs is a project with old trees in the Vancouver area, including the ‘1308 Trees’, urban forest sites where trees are being cleared for the Transmountain Pipeline expansion. The intention is to bear witness to trees who are supporting the well-being of human and nonhuman life. The project combines new technologies, such as 360° photography and video, ambisonic and geophonic sound recording, biomidi data, and contact mic recording, with approaches from acoustic ecology, multispecies creativity, and performance. The Branching Songs team produced methods for working collaboratively with trees and composed a collection of soundscapes and accompanying 360° photos and videos. The soundscapes present the complex biophony and anthropophony of each site, weaving in soundings from electromagnetic fields produced by the trees and our touch interactions with the tree bodies. The touch gestures are improvisational, responding to the emergent sounds heard on site, and the specific features of the participating tree. Multiple microphones allow us to listen to varied perspectives refracted across the tree body. Our video article includes an introduction to the project, the methods we developed, two soundscape compositions and accompanying visuals with the trees in the collaboration.@font-face{font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;mso-font-charset:0;mso-generic-font-family:roman;mso-font-pitch:variable;mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face{font-family:"Helvetica Neue";panose-1:2 0 5 3 0 0 0 2 0 4;mso-font-charset:0;mso-generic-font-family:auto;mso-font-pitch:variable;mso-font-signature:-452984065 1342208475 16 0 1 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal{mso-style-unhide:no;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";margin:0in;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}.MsoChpDefault{mso-style-type:export-only;mso-default-props:yes;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}div.WordSection1{page:WordSection1;}

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it