MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310423032 · doi:10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100150

A novel technique to measure the local mechanical properties of third generation advanced high strength steel resistance spot welds

2022· article· en· W4310423032 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelbaset R.H. Midawi, Mohammad Shojaee, Alireza Mohamadizadeh, Claire Bourque, H. Ghassemi-Aramki, Michael J. Worswick, C. Butcher, E. Biro

Bibliographic record

VenueForces in Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceDigital image correlationWeldingMicrostructureTensile testingSpot weldingDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialMetallurgyShear (geology)Heat-affected zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distinct microstructures and mechanical properties are produced in resistance spot welds (RSW) of advanced high-strength steels (AHSS). The local mechanical properties within the fusion zone (FZ) and heat-affected zones (HAZ) govern the global failure response of RSW automotive structural assemblies in crash events. In this study, a novel experimental procedure was developed to characterize the local properties of RSW sub-regions using sub-size tensile and simple shear specimens extracted from the spot weld, with local strain measurement utilizing digital image correlation (DIC) techniques. The FZ properties were obtained using a simple shear test, while the HAZ properties were characterized using a tensile test containing a central RSW. A range of AHSS grades were considered to evaluate the proposed methodology, including 3rd Gen-980, 3rd Gen-1180, and press-hardened steel (PHS1500) with respective minimum ultimate tensile strengths of 980 MPa, 1180 MPa, and 1500 MPa. Strain localization occurred wherever the hardness was lowest such as in the subcritical heat-affected zone, with limited deformation in the harder regions, such as the upper-critical HAZ and FZ. The local stress-strain responses were then compared to a hardness scaling approach to estimate the tensile properties of RSW based on the local hardness in each zone. The hardness scaling method only appears to be a viable method if the microstructures across the weld have similar microconstituents in all sub-zones across the weld.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForces in MechanicsSame topicAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisFrench-language works237,207