MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310438556 · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8

A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole

2022· article· en· W4310438556 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Andreoni, M. W. Coughlin, D. A. Perley, Yuhan Yao, Wenbin Lu, S. B. Cenko, Harsh Kumar, Shreya Anand, Anna Y. Q. Ho, M. M. Kasliwal, A. de Ugarte Postigo, Ana Sagués Carracedo, S. Schulze, Д. А. Канн, S. R. Kulkarni, J. Sollerman, N. R. Tanvir, A. Rest, L. Izzo, Jean J. Somalwar, D. L. Kaplan, Tomás Ahumada, G. C. Anupama, Katie Auchettl, Sudhanshu Barway, Eric C. Bellm, V. Bhalerao, J. S. Bloom, Michael Bremer, Mattia Bulla, Eric Burns, S. Campana, P. Chandra, P. Charalampopoulos, Jeff Cooke, V. D’Elia, Kaustav K. Das, Dougal Dobie, J. F. Agüí Fernández, James Freeburn, Cristoffer Fremling, Suvi Gezari, Simon Goode, M. J. Graham, Erica Hammerstein, Viraj Karambelkar, C. D. Kilpatrick, Erik C. Kool, Melanie Krips, Russ R. Laher, G. Leloudas, A. J. Levan, M. Lundquist, A. Mahabal, Michael S. Medford, M. Coleman Miller, A. Möller, K. P. Mooley, A. J. Nayana, Guy Nir, P. T. H. Pang, E. Paraskeva, R. A. Perley, G. Petitpas, M. Pursiainen, Vikram Ravi, Ryan Ridden-Harper, Reed Riddle, M. Rigault, Antonio C. Rodriguez, B. Rusholme, Y. Sharma, I. A. Smith, Robert D. Stein, C. C. Thöne, A. Tohuvavohu, F. Valdés, Jan van Roestel, S. D. Vergani, Qinan Wang, Jielai Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasStockholms UniversitetJunta de AndalucíaNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanIndian Institute of Technology BombayUniversitetet i OsloMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteEuropean Southern ObservatoryMax-Planck-GesellschaftNational Science FoundationLiverpool John Moores UniversityInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekSmithsonian InstitutionNordForskVetenskapsrådetScience and Technology Facilities CouncilTurun YliopistoAarhus UniversitetNational Astronomical Research Institute of ThailandVillum FondenGoddard Space Flight CenterPrinceton UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAcademia SinicaWenner-Gren StiftelsernaEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHáskóli ÍslandsKnut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsJet (fluid)AstronomyStar (game theory)Black hole (networking)MechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207