Clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy before heart transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty myocardial replacement, and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. The clinical course of patients expressing a severe phenotype of the disease needing heart transplantation (HTx) is not well described in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to describe the clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with ACM necessitating HTx. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent HTx in our institution between 1998 and 2019 with a definite diagnosis of ACM according to the explanted heart examination. RESULTS: Ten patients with confirmed ACM underwent HTx. Only four of them had a diagnosis of ACM before HTx. These patients were 28 ± 15 years old at the time of their first symptoms. Patients received a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) after 5.9 ± 8.7 years of symptom evolution. The mean age at transplantation was 40 ± 17 years old. All the patients experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) at least once before their HTx and 50% were resuscitated after sudden death. The mean left ventricular ejection at diagnosis and before transplantation was similar (32% ± 21% vs. 35.0% ± 19.3%, p = NS). Right ventricular dysfunction was present in all patients at the time of transplantation. CONCLUSION: Patients with ACM necessitating HTx show a high burden of ventricular arrhythmias and frequently present a biventricular involvement phenotype, making early diagnosis challenging. HF symptoms are the most frequent reason leading to the decision to transplant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".