Surrogate lower limb design for ankle-foot orthosis mechanical evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study designs and provides a pilot evaluation of a novel surrogate lower limb (SLL) that provides anatomically realistic three-dimensional (3D) foot motion, based on a literature consensus of passive lower limb motion. This SLL is intended to replace single axis surrogates currently used in mechanical testing of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO). Material and Methods: The SLL design is inspired by the Rizzoli foot model, with shank, hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and toe sections. Ball and socket joints were used between hindfoot-midfoot (HM)-forefoot sections. Forefoot-toes used a hinge joint. Three-dimensional printed nylon, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polylactic acid (PLA), as well as casted silicone rubber were used to re-create foot components. After fabrication, motion capture was performed to measure rotation using fiducial markers. The SLL was then loaded under both static and cyclic loads representing a 100 kg person walking for 500,000 cycles. Results: Most joints were within 5° of target angles. The SLL survived static loads representing 1.5 times body weight for both static and cyclical loading. Conclusions: This SLL moved as designed and survived testing loads, warranting further investigation towards enabling essential mechanical testing for AFO currently on the market, and helping to guide device prescription.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".