Conjugate mixed convection heat transfer with internal heat generation in a lid-driven enclosure with spinning solid cylinder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study investigates conjugate mixed convection heat transmission with internal heat generation in a square enclosure driven by a sliding lid and a solid cylinder with a heat-conducting surface at its center. The enclosure has a stationary bottom wall that is kept at a constant hot temperature and a cold upper wall that moves consistently. The solid cylinder rotates both clockwise and counterclockwise at different angular speeds. Two-dimensional steady continuity, momentum, thermal energy equations, and boundary and interface conditions are solved using a commercial CFD tool based on the finite element method. By choosing Reynolds, Grashof, and Richardson numbers, as well as varying the rotating cylinder's speed and direction under three different scenarios incorporating volumetric heat generation, parametric modeling of the mixed convection regime is carried out. The streamline and isotherm plots are used to illustrate qualitative findings. In contrast, the average Nusselt number, normalized Nusselt number, average drag coefficient, and average fluid temperature are used to assess quantitative thermal performance measures. This study reveals that the system's thermal performance is less dependent on the solid cylinder's rotational speed and direction. It successfully depicts the heat transfer enhancement with increasing Reynolds and Grashof numbers. A thorough study of the current facts can lead to the best choice of regulating parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".