MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310489808 · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-7204

Data-Driven Sustainability Validation of Winter Traffic Model through Spatial Transferability of the Model’s Parameters between Functionally Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Highway Segments

2022· article· en· W4310489808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransferabilityHomogeneousComputer scienceTransport engineeringEnvironmental scienceSpatial analysisGeographyEngineeringMathematicsRemote sensingMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transportation agencies in the cold region are responsible for developing winter traffic models and verifying their sustainability to save financial and human resources while enhancing the suitability of the developed models. To do this, they operate traffic monitoring sites to collect traffic volume and loading data in their network using technologies such as permanent traffic counters (PTCs) and weigh-in-motion (WIM). None of the previous studies have conducted spatial transferability of the winter traffic models’ parameters between homogeneous and heterogeneous road segments during the winter season. This research pursues this using traffic data collected from six WIM sites in Alberta, Canada. Winter traffic models were developed for two WIM sites that serve commuter traffics. The other four WIM sites serving different travel populations besides commuter traffic were exhaustively utilized to test the developed models. The raw WIM data were aggregated into three vehicle types to develop winter traffic models by associating traffic data with climatic information. Two spatial transferability tests for the developed models were designed and carried out. The first test was conducted between the two modeling sites for which the winter traffic models were developed. The first experiment pursued a cross-spatial transferability test between homogeneous road segments. The second experiment tested the transferability of model parameters between heterogeneous road segments that represent a different road function other than commuter type. The models’ parameters developed for the two commuter segments were transferred to the other four sites to test their spatial transferability. This research has demonstrated that the winter traffic models developed for the roads serving one specific travel population can be transferred with high accuracy to homogeneous and heterogeneous road segments. It revealed that a more suitable model structure could be selected for each site and vehicle class, considering the accuracy of the test results. This research contributes to planning and designing traffic monitoring or weighing site deployment to save financial and human resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it