Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article étudie le sonnet dans sa dimension politique. Il établit une comparaison entre un poète imaginaire de la Renaissance, Guillaume du Vintrais, créé de toutes pièces par deux détenus de goulag, Youri Veynert et Yakov Kharon, et son célèbre prototype Clément Marot, poète français, humaniste et libertin, emprisonné et poursuivi en tant qu’adepte de la Réforme. Tous les deux, Guillaume du Vintrais et Clément Marot, choisissent la forme du sonnet afin d’exprimer leur idéal de liberté et défendre la dignité humaine dans les conditions où toutes voix divergentes sont étouffées par le dogme. L’étude analyse la poétique subversive du poème amoureux dans les contextes sociaux et politiques en France dans les années 1530–1540 et en l’URSS dans les années 1930–1940. Malgré les quatre siècles qui séparent les deux époques, les règles de la joute qui oppose un oppresseur à un libre-penseur n’ont pas beaucoup changé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".