Transcription elongator SPT6L regulates the occupancies of the SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodelers SYD/BRM and nucleosomes at transcription start sites in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromatin remodelers have been thought to be crucial in creating an accessible chromatin environment before transcription activation. However, it is still unclear how chromatin remodelers recognize and bind to the active regions. In this study, we found that chromatin remodelers SPLAYED (SYD) and BRAHMA (BRM) interact and co-occupy with Suppressor of Ty6-like (SPT6L), a core subunit of the transcription machinery, at thousands of the transcription start sites (TSS). The association of SYD and BRM to chromatin is dramatically reduced in spt6l and can be restored mainly by SPT6LΔtSH2, which binds to TSS in a RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-independent manner. Furthermore, SPT6L and SYD/BRM are involved in regulating the nucleosome and Pol II occupancy around TSS. The presence of SPT6L is sufficient to restore the association of the chromatin remodeler SYD to chromatin and maintain normal nucleosome occupancy. Our findings suggest that the two chromatin remodelers can form protein complexes with the core subunit of the transcription machinery and regulate nucleosome occupancy in the early transcription stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".