MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310491444 · doi:10.17182/hepdata.78403

Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 7 and 8 TeV

2018· dataset· en· W4310491444 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaNational Institutes of HealthBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesPakistan Atomic Energy CommissionBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíGeorgian National Science FoundationMinistry of Education, IndiaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSEuropean Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningHungarian Scientific Research FundState Fund for Fundamental Research of UkraineGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichChulalongkorn UniversityAustrian Science FundFondation Partager le SavoirNational Science CouncilMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroU.S. Department of EnergyOntario Innovation TrustNational Science and Technology Development AgencyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineInstitute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and TechnologyCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalCERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondSecretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e InnovaciónAlfred P. Sloan FoundationRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchA.G. Leventis FoundationCanarie
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderHiggs bosonParticle physicsAtlas (anatomy)PhysicsProduction (economics)Nuclear physicsMathematicsBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CERN-LHC. Combined ATLAS and CMS measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates, as well as constraints on its couplings to vector bosons and fermions, are presented. The combination is based on the analysis of five production processes, namely gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production with a $W$ or a $Z$ boson or a pair of top quarks, and of the six decay modes $H \to ZZ, WW$, $\gamma\gamma, \tau\tau, bb$, and $\mu\mu$. All results are reported assuming a value of 125.09 GeV for the Higgs boson mass, the result of the combined measurement by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. The analysis uses the CERN LHC proton-proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2011 and 2012, corresponding to integrated luminosities per experiment of approximately 5 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 20 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The Higgs boson production and decay rates measured by the two experiments are combined within the context of three generic parameterisations: two based on cross sections and branching fractions, and one on ratios of coupling modifiers. Several interpretations of the measurements with more model-dependent parameterisations are also given. The combined signal yield relative to the Standard Model prediction is measured to be 1.09 $\pm$ 0.11. The combined measurements lead to observed significances for the vector boson fusion production process and for the $H \to \tau\tau$ decay of 5.4 and 5.5 standard deviations, respectively. The data are consistent with the Standard Model predictions for all parameterisations considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations187
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207