Decay of the Λ(1405) hyperon to Σ<sup>0</sup>π<sup>0</sup> measured at GlueX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Among the light baryons, the Jπ = 1/2− Λ(1405) hyperon is an important special case as it sits just below the N K̅ threshold and decays almost exclusively to Σπ. Some long-standing hypotheses for Λ(1405) are that it could be a N K̅ bound state or a Σπ continuum resonance. It may also be considered as a simple quark-model resonance, the P-wave companion of the Λ(1520). In recent years chiral unitary models have suggested that there are two isospin zero poles present in this mass region, and that the “line shape" of the Λ(1405) depends to what extent each of the two poles are stimulated in a given reaction. Below the N K̅ threshold, the Λ(1405) decays to the three Σπ charge combinations. The Σ0π0 mode is purely I = 0 and it is uncontaminated by complications arising from I = 1 scattering processes contributing to the reaction mechanism in the Σ+π− and Σ−π+ decays. It is also not affected from production and decay of the nearby Σ0(1385) hyperon. The GlueX experiment at Jefferson Lab has been used to study the Λ(1405) → Σ0π0 decay mode. We focus on the preliminary results of dσ/dMΣ0π0 and fits to the line shape of the Λ(1405) region in the −(t − tmin) range 0 - 1.5 GeV2 from analyzing the reaction γp → K+Λ* using the data collected during the first phase of the GlueX program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".