MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automated Impulse PD Testing for Early Detection and Classification of PD in the Stator Insulation of Low Voltage VFD Motors

2022· article· en· W4310502940 on OpenAlexaff
Cheol-Hui Park, Hyeonjun Lee, Marcos Orviz, Sang Bin Lee, David Reigosa, Fernando Briz, G.C. Stone

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorPartial dischargeVariable-frequency driveVoltageAutomotive engineeringImpulse (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical stresses in industrial variable frequency drive (VFD) motors are increasing with the increasing voltage and dv/dt levels, and with the advent of wide bandgap power devices. This increases the likelihood of partial discharge (PD) in VFD motors, and is expected to increase the risk of stator insulation failures in low voltage (LV) motors for which the insulation is not resistant to PD. To ensure that PD does not occur during operation, LV VFD motors are qualified for PD-free operation in the design or manufacturing stages. However, the PD inception voltage of qualified LV motors decreases with insulation aging exposing them to the risk of PD-induced failure. In this work, an automated off-line test method for VFD-embedded PD testing is proposed. The main idea is to perform PD testing at motor standstill at a voltage higher than the operating voltage to identify PD activity in the insulation early, before it occurs during operation. A series of impulse voltage tests are proposed for stressing the different components of insulation for identifying PD in terminal-end ground, phase, and turn insulation. Testing on a LV, VFD motor verifies that PD can be identified whenever the motor is stopped to provide early warning of insulation failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207