MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310521158 · doi:10.1109/ius54386.2022.9957589

Real-Time Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging using GPU Acceleration

2022· article· en· W4310521158 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Kazmarek Præsius, Matthias Bo Stuart, Mikkel Schou, Bernd Dammann, Hans Henrik Brandenborg Sørensen, Jørgen Arendt Jensen

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsCompute Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphics processing unitBeamformingFrame rateImage processingArtificial intelligenceSignal processingParallel processingVisualizationGraphicsComputer visionThroughputScannerComputer graphics (images)Computer hardwareDigital signal processingImage (mathematics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method SUper-Resolution ultrasound imaging using the Erythrocytes as targets (SURE) is fully non-invasive, and can reliably visualize vessels with sizes down to 50 μm (1/3 of the wavelength) from a few seconds of data acquisition. Ideally, the acquisition and display should be done in seconds, but this is a challenge since the processing of SURE images is computationally demanding. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are specialized for high-throughput parallel processing, and in this paper it was explored whether a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU can enable real-time processing of SURE images, meaning the processing can keep up with the imaging rate of 417 Hz, allowing for a live video feed, similar to conventional ultrasound imaging. In-vivo data was acquired from a Sprague-Dawley rat kidney with a 168 channel GE-L8-18iD 10 MHz linear array probe connected to a Verasonics Vantage 256 scanner at a 62.5 MHz sampling rate. The GPU was used to perform beamforming, motion correction, stationary echo cancellation and peak localization. The resulting processing rate was 475 Hz for the beamforming, and 497 Hz for the proceeding processing steps, resulting in a total rate of 239 Hz. Consequently, SURE images can now be acquired in 2 seconds, and shown approximately 1 second after this, making it possible to visualize super resolution images of the microvasculature at the bedside, for immediate diagnosis of the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207