MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin Following Vaginal and Cesarean Delivery: A Before-After Study

2022· article· en· W4310551765 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. Tareef, Kristi Downey, B. Ma, W. Whittle, J.C.A. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUterotonicMedicineOxytocinVaginal deliveryBlood transfusionBlood lossObstetricsEconomic shortageIncidence (geometry)Postpartum haemorrhageAnesthesiaPregnancySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Can J Anaesth . 2022;69:97–105) Postpartum hemorrhage increases mortality, morbidity, potential blood transfusion, and length of hospital stay. Usually oxytocin, an effective agent with a short half-life and various possible side effects, is most used to treat postpartum hemorrhage. Carbetocin, though an unpopular method of treatment, has a longer half-life. Because of the shortage of oxytocin in Canada between the months of October and November in 2019, all stakeholders began to use carbetocin. This study researched the difference between carbetocin and oxytocin, especially regarding additional uterotonic medication administration, incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, and blood transfusion rates in a pragmatic before-after study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207