MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310584106 · doi:10.1109/ius54386.2022.9958313

Transformer-Based Microbubble Localization

2022· article· en· W4310584106 on OpenAlexafffund
Sepideh K. Gharamaleki, Brandon Helfield, Hassan Rivaz

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTransformerComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)VoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) is an emerging technique that employs the localization of echogenic microbubbles (MBs) to finely sample and image the microcirculation beyond the diffraction limit of ultrasound imaging. Conventional MB localization methods are mainly based on considering a specific Point Spread Function (PSF) for MBs, which leads to loss of information caused by overlapping MBs, non-stationary PSFs, and harmonic MB echoes. Therefore, it is imperative to devise methods that can accurately localize MBs while being resilient to MB nonlinearities, and variations of MB concentrations that distort MB PSFs. This paper proposes a transformer-based MB localization approach to address this issue. We adopted DEtection TRansformer (DETR) [1], which is an end-to-end object recognition method that detects a unique bounding box for each of the detected objects using set-based Hungarian loss and bipartite matching. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time transformers have been used for MB localization. To appraise the proposed strategy, the pre-trained DETR network's performance has been tested for detecting MBs using transfer learning principles. We have fine-tuned the network on a subset of randomly selected frames of the dataset provided by the IEEE IUS Ultra-SR challenge organizers and then tested on the rest using cross-validation. For the simulation dataset, the paper supports the deployment of transformer-based solutions for MB localization at high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207