MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310584371 · doi:10.1109/ius54386.2022.9958236

In Vivo Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging using the Erythrocytes - SURE

2022· article· en· W4310584371 on OpenAlexaff
Jørgen Arendt Jensen, Mikkel Schou, S. B. Andersen, Borislav Gueorguiev Tomov, Stinne Byrholdt Søgaard, Charlotte Mehlin Sørensen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Carsten Gundlach, Hans Martin Kjer, Anders Bjorholm Dahl, Matthias Bo Stuart

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsCompute Canada
FundersH2020 European Research Council
KeywordsIn vivoUltrasoundResolution (logic)Ultrasonic imagingUltrasound imagingComputer scienceImage resolutionPreclinical imagingSuperresolutionBiomedical engineeringComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRadiologyMedicineImage (mathematics)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current super resolution imaging is conducted using ultrasound contrast agents, where a sparse distribution of bubbles must be employed to separate individual targets. The sparse targets make the acquisition time long in the range of 1 to 10 minutes, and therefore demands an accurate motion correction over a long time. The employment of a contrast agent also lowers MI to below 0.2 to not disrupt the bubbles, with a corresponding lower signal-to-noise ratio in the images. A new method, SURE (SUper Resolution ultrasound imaging using Erythrocytes), where erythrocytes are used as targets, is suggested to alleviate these problems. Perfused tissues contain an abundance of targets, and the full clinical pressure range can be used. It is hypothesized that super resolution imaging below the diffraction limit can be attained in seconds using SURE imaging. A SURE processing pipeline was developed with modules for beamforming, tissue motion estimation, alignment, singular value decomposition for echo canceling, and subsequent peak detection in the speckle pattern. The detected peaks were summed in a high-resolution image for yielding the SURE image. Data were acquired using a 10 MHz linear array GE L10-18i probe (150 µm wavelength) and a Verasonics Vantage 256 scanner. A synthetic aperture scan sequence with 12 emissions was employed at a pulse repetition frequency of 5 kHz for a 417 Hz frame rate. Kidneys of Sprague-Dawley rats were scanned for 24 seconds and RF data stored for off-line processing. The excised kidneys were micro-CT scanned for 11 hours for generating reference maps of the vasculature with a voxel size of 21 µm. SURE images revealed vessels with sizes down to 50 µm. Fourier ring correlations between independent images measured for 12 s revealed a resolution between 25 to 49 µm, demonstrating the super resolution capability of the method. The SURE images are obtained in 1 to 12 seconds, demand no injection of intravenous contrast agents, and can use the full pressure and intensity range allowed in medical ultrasound, making the method easily adaptable to clinical use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207