MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310584541 · doi:10.1109/ius54386.2022.9958260

Detection of Hematoma Boundaries in Transcranial Ultrasound Brain Imaging via Envelope Reconstruction on Resonance-based Signal Decomposition

2022· article· en· W4310584541 on OpenAlexaff
Aryaz Baradarani, Kiyanoosh Shapoori, Eugene Malyarenko, Jeff Sadler, Juri G. Gelovani, Roman Gr. Maev

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsWindsor Clinical Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscranial DopplerComputer scienceNeuroimagingUltrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingSIGNAL (programming language)MedicineMedical physicsComputer visionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TRUBI (Transcranial Ultrasound Brain Imaging) system is a 3D transcranial ultrasound brain imaging device from Tessonics Medical Systems to address the main limitations of conventional transcranial imaging, i.e., the highly distorting effects of human skull. Apart from the hardware design and interface software of the device in general, theoretical design, analysis and implementation of the signal processing unit of the system is one of the main challenges. In this paper, we briefly present part of the signal processing algorithm used in the prototype version of the TRUBI to extract desired features required to detect intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) during 3D transcranial ultrasound brain imaging. Difficulties in ultrasound-based transcranial imaging are mostly related to the fact that the skull attenuates and distorts acoustic signals dramatically. Despite the challenges, and unlike other available techniques, transcranial brain imaging with ultrasound is portable, radiation-free, not expensive and can be used easily not only in hospitals but also in clinics, emergency, ambulance and remote areas with no access to MRI or CT scanner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207