Retrospective, observational analysis of cardiac function associated with global preoperative myocardial scar in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy after coronary artery bypass grafting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Drawing on accumulated patient data from a hospital database, the goal of this retrospective study was to analyze cardiac function associated with global preoperative myocardial scarring assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement (CMR-LGE) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: A total of 57 patients diagnosed with ICM who underwent isolated CABG at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between September 2017 and September 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. All these patients underwent a preoperative CMR-LGE examination. Based on postoperative echocardiography results at 6 months, cases were divided into the following 2 groups: improved cardiac function [a difference of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 5%] and unimproved cardiac function. The factors contributing to these patients’ unimproved cardiac function were investigated. Results: At 6 months after surgery, 64.9% (37/57) of cases had improved cardiac function, and 35.1% (20/57) had no improvement. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (41.7±7.6 vs. 42.8±8.3; P=0.603), but compared to the improved group, preoperative myocardial scarring was significantly enlarged in the unimproved group (41.9%±6.4% vs. 27.8%±8.5%; P<0.001). In regression analysis, only preoperative myocardial scarring [odds ratio (OR) =1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.83; P=0.003] was associated with no change in cardiac function evaluated by echocardiography after CABG. The median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.6–4.1 years) found that the unimproved group had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (8.1% vs. 25.0%; P=0.044), and that the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of the unimproved group was higher than that of the improved group (P=0.018). Conclusions: In ICM patients, a greater amount of preoperative myocardial scarring is associated with unimproved cardiac function after CABG. The measurement of preoperative myocardial scarring may aid clinicians in identifying patients who would benefit from CABG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".