The First Offer of Alcohol from the Adult Person and Cannabis Use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter is based on the data from the national survey on tobacco, alcohol, and drugs among primary and secondary school students aged 15–19 implemented in eight regions of Slovakia during Spring 2018. An unexpected shift was observed in the relationship between the age young people were offered alcohol by an adult and the age when they first experienced its effect. In previous surveys, the mean age of the first offer predated the felt effect of alcohol (“tipsiness”) by about 1 year on average. Our data revealed that following the initial offer of alcohol by an adult, approximately ¾ of participants felt the effect of alcohol later or during the same year (groups 1 and 2); however, in the remaining cases, the effect was felt before alcohol was offered by an adult (group 3). Thus, it appears that one-fifth to one-quarter of participants did not go through the usual ritual of initiation by adults. The analysis showed that this group of participants used cannabis more often than the rest of the sample. Furthermore, there were differences observed among the three groups in reported school attendance, legal and illegal drug use, and bullying. Possible implications of these findings are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".