Single-timepoint low-dimensional characterization and classification of acute versus chronic multiple sclerosis lesions using machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease characterized by the appearance of focal lesions across the central nervous system. The discrimination of acute from chronic MS lesions may yield novel biomarkers of inflammatory disease activity which may support patient management in the clinical setting and provide endpoints in clinical trials. On a single timepoint and in the absence of a prior reference scan, existing methods for acute lesion detection rely on the segmentation of hyperintense foci on post-gadolinium T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which may underestimate recent acute lesion activity. In this paper, we aim to improve the sensitivity of acute MS lesion detection in the single-timepoint setting, by developing a novel machine learning approach for the automatic detection of acute MS lesions, using single-timepoint conventional non-contrast T1- and T2-weighted brain MRI. The MRI input data are supplemented via the use of a convolutional neural network generating "lesion-free" reconstructions from original "lesion-present" scans using image inpainting. A multi-objective statistical ranking module evaluates the relevance of textural radiomic features from the core and periphery of lesion sites, compared within "lesion-free" versus "lesion-present" image pairs. Then, an ensemble classifier is optimized through a recursive loop seeking consensus both in the feature space (via a greedy feature-pruning approach) and in the classifier space (via model selection repeated after each pruning operation). This leads to the identification of a compact textural signature characterizing lesion phenotype. On the patch-level task of acute versus chronic MS lesion classification, our method achieves a balanced accuracy in the range of 74.3-74.6% on fully external validation cohorts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".