Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Kundu R, Singh A, Datta PK, Shrivastava A, Srinivasan S. Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. 2022;54(4):334-338. doi:10.5114/ait.2022.120997. APA Kundu, R., Singh, A., Datta, P. K., Shrivastava, A., & Srinivasan, S. (2022). Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 54(4), 334-338. https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120997 Chicago Kundu, Riddhi, Ajeet Singh, Priyankar K Datta, Ashish Shrivastava, and Shrikanth Srinivasan. 2022. "Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome". Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 54 (4): 334-338. doi:10.5114/ait.2022.120997. Harvard Kundu, R., Singh, A., Datta, P., Shrivastava, A., and Srinivasan, S. (2022). Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 54(4), pp.334-338. https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2022.120997 MLA Kundu, Riddhi et al. "Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome." Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, vol. 54, no. 4, 2022, pp. 334-338. doi:10.5114/ait.2022.120997. Vancouver Kundu R, Singh A, Datta P, Shrivastava A, Srinivasan S. Extracorporeal life support as rescue therapy in severe bronchiectasis with Kartagener’s syndrome. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. 2022;54(4):334-338. doi:10.5114/ait.2022.120997.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".