Performance Analysis of Hardware Implementations of Reverse Conversion from the Residue Number System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Residue Number System (RNS) is a non-positional number system that allows parallel computations without transfers between digits. However, some operations in RNS require knowledge of the positional characteristic of a number. Among these operations is the conversion from RNS to the positional number system. The methods of reverse conversion for general form moduli based on the Chinese remainder theorem and the mixed-radix conversion are considered, as well as the optimized methods for special form moduli. In this paper, a method is proposed that develops the authors’ ideas based on the modified mixed-radix conversion and reference points. The modified method based on the mixed-radix conversion in this case makes it possible to replace the operation of finding the residue of division by a large modulo with the sequential calculation of the residue. The method of reference points allows to reduce the size of the stored information compared to the use of ROM to store all the residues of RNS. The application of this approach makes it possible to find a balance between the speed of the calculation and the hardware used, by varying the number of moduli of one method and the other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".