MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310726309 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v42i2.39711

Jane E. Everson, Andrew Hiscock, and Stefano Jossa, eds. Ariosto: the Orlando Furioso and English Culture

2022· article· en· W4310726309 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lucia Gemmani

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nella conclusione, "Postcolonial Returns" (247-62), McGuire, riprendendo tutti i temi affrontati nei capitoli precedenti, si concentra sulle isole dell'Egeo come luogo della memoria; zona del rimosso per la storiografia italiana, ma anche sito di una memoria selettiva anche per la controparte greca.Ottimo lo studio del film di Gabriele Salvatores, Mediterraneo, quale paradigma di omissioni storiche, selezione e riproposizione di stereotipi sul ruolo dell'Italia fascista nel Dodecaneso.Corredato di fotografie e illustrazioni rare, il libro di Valerie McGuire prende in considerazione altri aspetti storico sociali riguardanti l'Arcipelago, come problemi di discriminazione di genere e la fittissima rete di rapporti e legami tra il passato ottomano, greco e la colonizzazione italiana e le sue implicazioni sulla popolazione locale delle isole dai suoi esordi nel 1912 fino al periodo fascista.Si tratta di un eccellente testo, scritto in una prosa accattivante, di una novità assoluta nell'ambito dell'Italianistica, ma anche nel contesto più vasto degli studi coloniali e postcoloniali.Il capitolo "Everyday Fascism in the Aegean," diventerà una lettura obbligatoria per gli studenti del mio corso sul fascismo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207