Alterità scientifica e alterità etnica: la costruzione del personaggio di Albumazar nell’Astrologo di Giovan Battista Della Porta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In questo articolo analizzeremo la cultura, la lingua e le caratteristiche etniche di Albumazar, protagonista della commedia l’Astrologo (1606) di Giovan Battista Della Porta (1535–1615). Questo personaggio rientra nello stereotipo del mago ciarlatano e truffatore, la cui rappresentazione conosce una grande fortuna nel teatro rinascimentale e barocco. Mettendo in scena gli imbrogli di Albumazar, Della Porta non sembra soltanto difendersi dalle accuse e dai sospetti del Sant’Uffizio, ma potrebbe anche mostrare la veridicità delle sue posizioni scientifiche, perché il protagonista dell’Astrologo sembra opporsi alle tesi sostenute dallo scrittore campano in altre opere. In tal senso, Della Porta potrebbe legittimare le proprie teorie alchemiche e fisiognomiche grazie agli errori e alle truffe del protagonista della pièce.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".