MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance of a convolutional autoencoder designed to remove electronic noise from p-type point contact germanium detector signals

2022· article· en· W4310748652 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark R. Anderson, V. Basu, R. D. Martin, Charlotte Z. Reed, Noah J. Rowe, Mehdi Shafiee, Tianai Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationNvidia
KeywordsAutoencoderDetectorNoise (video)Noise reductionComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)EncoderFocus (optics)Artificial intelligenceRepresentation (politics)Filter (signal processing)Electronic engineeringPhysicsComputer visionOpticsDeep learningEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a convolutional autoencoder to denoise pulses from a p-type point contact high-purity germanium detector similar to those used in several rare event searches. While we focus on training procedures that rely on detailed detector physics simulations, we also present implementations requiring only noisy detector pulses to train the model. We validate our autoencoder on both simulated data and calibration data from an $$^{241}$$ 241 Am source, the latter of which is used to show that the denoised pulses are statistically compatible with data pulses. We demonstrate that our denoising method is able to preserve the underlying shapes of the pulses well, offering improvement over traditional denoising methods. We also show that the shaping time used to calculate energy with a trapezoidal filter can be significantly reduced while maintaining a comparable energy resolution. Under certain circumstances, our denoising method can improve the overall energy resolution. The methods we developed to remove electronic noise are straightforward to extend to other detector technologies. Furthermore, the latent representation from the encoder is also of use in quantifying shape-based characteristics of the signals. Our work has great potential to be used in particle physics experiments and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207