MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310800049 · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2022.0342

Aerobic scope falls to nil at <i>P</i> <sub>crit</sub> and anaerobic ATP production increases below <i>P</i> <sub>crit</sub> in the tidepool sculpin, <i>Oligocottus maculosus</i>

2022· article· en· W4310800049 on OpenAlexafffund
Derek Somo, Ken Chu, Jeffrey G. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsAnaerobic exerciseBiologyOxygenCellular respirationHypoxia (environmental)RespirometryEcologyBiochemistryChemistryPhysiologyMitochondrion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical oxygen tension of whole-animal oxygen uptake rate, or P crit , has historically been defined as the oxygen partial pressure ( P O 2 ) at which aerobic scope falls to zero and further declines in P O 2 require substrate-level phosphorylation to meet shortfalls in aerobic ATP production, thereby time-limiting survival. Despite the inclusion of aerobic scope and anaerobic ATP production in the definition, little effort has been made to verify that P crit measurements, the vast majority of which are obtained using respirometry in resting animals, actually reflect the predictions of zero aerobic scope and a transition to increasing reliance on anaerobic ATP production. To test these predictions, we compared aerobic scope and levels of whole-body lactate at oxygen partial pressures ( P O 2 s) bracketing P crit obtained in resting fish during progressive hypoxia in the tidepool sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus . We found that aerobic scope falls to zero at P crit and, in resting fish exposed to P O 2 s &lt; P crit , whole-body lactate accumulated pointing to an increased reliance on anaerobic ATP production. These results support the interpretation of P crit as a key oxygen threshold at which aerobic scope falls to nil and, below P crit , survival is time-limited based on anaerobic metabolic capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology LettersSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207