MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310833136 · doi:10.3917/rdm1.059.0115

Le voyage complet du concept d’identité sur lui-même

2022· article· fr· W4310833136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du MAUSS · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyEthnologyConscienceArtSociologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose de tirer les leçons du voyage complet du concept d’identité sur lui-même. La modernité originelle du concept est établie à partir de la thèse de Balibar sur « l’invention de la conscience » chez Locke qui le premier proposa de substituer la continuité à soi-même dans le monde à la notion d’âme comme fondement de la personne. Le deuxième moment de ce voyage a trait à la crise d’identité observée par Erikson à propos de la jeunesse américaine refusant de « se » constituer dans le cadre des idéaux actuels offerts par leur société. Le dernier moment de ce voyage est représenté par la « réfutation » du concept d’identité comme mystification par Butler. Considérés dans leur mouvement historique d’ensemble, ces trois moments font ressortir l’épuisement de la tentative moderne d’intégrer toutes les dimensions de l’existence à partir de la catégorie d’identité subjective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it