MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310837586 · doi:10.32657/10356/162609

Securing the Internet of Things using machine learning

2022· dissertation· en· W4310837586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harun Surej Ilango

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceThe InternetInternet privacyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things has shown its potential to empower various industry sectors. From smart homes to healthcare, IoT devices have become omnipresent. The network layer of the IoT system can be subjected to many types of attacks such as DoS, sybil attacks, replay attacks. These attacks on the network layer significantly degrade the network performance. Hence, it is of primary importance to secure the network layer from these attacks to protect the integrity of the data flowing through the network while ensuring timely delivery of key information. The first part of this work focused on protecting the IoT network from one specific variant of the above-specified attacks, the Low-Rate Denial of Service (LR DoS) attacks. LR DoS attacks are a more insidious type of DoS attack. They remain stealthy in the network, undetected by conventional DoS detection systems, while having the same effect as conventional DoS attacks. In this work, Software Defined Networking (SDN) is used in conjunction with an Artificial Intelligence (AI) based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to protect the IoT network from LR DoS attacks. An AI-based anomaly detection scheme called FeedForward - Convolutional Neural Network (FFCNN) is proposed and discussed in the first part of the thesis. The Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity Denial of Service 2017 (CIC DoS 2017) dataset is used for the study. The performance of FFCNN is analyzed using the metrics accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, detection time per flow, and ROC curves and is compared to the other machine learning algorithms - J48, Random Forest, Random Tree, REP Tree, SVM, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). The empirical analysis shows that FFCNN achieves higher detection accuracy in detecting LR DoS attacks than the other machine learning algorithms. The penetration of IoT into the transportation sector has given rise to a new networking paradigm called the Internet of Vehicles. In the Internet of Vehicles networks, vehicles periodically broadcast their current positions, speeds, and accelerations through Basic Safety Messages (BSMs) using the Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) standard. Safety-critical applications like blind-spot warning and lane change warning systems use the BSMs to ensure the safety of road users. However, adversaries can modify the contents of the messages that affect the efficacy of the developed applications. One such attack is the position falsification attack, where the attacker inserts false position information into the BSMs. To address this issue, the second part of the thesis proposes and discusses an AI-based position falsification attack detection system, Novel Position Falsification Attack Detection System for the Internet of Vehicles (NPFADS for the IoV), that can detect novel position falsification attacks emerging in IoV networks. The performance NPFADS is quantitatively analyzed using the metrics accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score, ROC curves, and PR curves. The Vehicular Reference Misbehavior (VeReMi) dataset is used as the benchmark for the study. The system’s performance is also compared to the existing misbehavior detection systems in the literature. The analysis shows that our proposed system outperforms the existing supervised learning models even when initialized with zero knowledge about the novel position falsification attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207