MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310867803 · doi:10.26522/vp.v19i2.4139

Enfer ou forge : d’où revient le Victor Hugo de l’exil ?

2022· article· fr· W4310867803 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Moustapha Faye

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorsque Victor Hugo débarque à Paris en 1870, son retour sur sa terre natale est célébré comme un triomphe dionysiaque par un peuple qui vit le retour du fils sous le mode du fantasme biblique. Dix-neuf années se sont passées depuis décembre 1851 lorsque la figure tutélaire de Paris a fui la capitale avec un faux passeport pour se réfugier en Belgique. Hugo était convaincu que la révolte populaire était en marche qui allait bouter hors de France l’usurpateur. Mais Louis-Napoléon sort renforcé de la tempête et Hugo est confronté à la situation qu’il redoutait le plus : être coupé de sa patrie. Alors que Jean Valjean passe, lui aussi, dix-neuf ans de bagne pour avoir cherché à sauver ses neveux, on estime l’étendue du traumatisme de celui pour qui de telles contradictions ne pourraient se soutenir que sur les pilotis d’un roman aux accents néo-burlesques. Mais une fois au cœur de l’exil, Hugo est métamorphosé, semblant sortir d’une chrysalide l’ayant longtemps emprisonné.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix PluriellesSame topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207