MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310869888 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170722

Transformation of Threats to Demographic Security and Sustainable Development of the Region Due to Increased Military Actions

2022· article· en· W4310869888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceSustainable developmentContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)BusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Human securityEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEconomic growthGeographyPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of the article is to identify the main threats to demographic security and sustainable development of the region in the context of military actions. The methodology implies modern methods of hierarchical analysis and analysis methods. The reason for choosing this topic is accompanied by the fact that, because demographic factors significantly affect the stability and security of the development of the region, the problem of ensuring demographic security, in particular in terms of identifying and tracking changes in key threats, is relevant and important for the further restoration of human resources. According to the results of the study, the features of the transformation of the main threats to demographic security and sustainable development of a particular region were determined. A response level matrix was proposed for each of the identified threats in order to counteract the most impact and further reduce the pace of implementation of activities. Research has limitations. The fact that as a result of hostilities, a small number of regions can be the object of research. In the future, we should consider the demographic security and sustainable development of regions that do not have the influence of military actions and compare them with our research results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it