MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310870306 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170731

The Internal Model of Default Credit for Rural Banks in Indonesia

2022· article· en· W4310870306 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yani Monalisa, Sugiarto Sugiarto

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Prasetiya Mulya
KeywordsDefaultInterest rateCredit riskProbability of defaultBusinessActuarial scienceDebtorEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urgency of the internal model of default credit for the rural bank in Indonesia is increasing due to the recent acceleration of the increase in Non-Performing Loans at rural banks. This research will formulate an internal model of default credit that can reduce the level of default risk in rural banks based on the explanatory sequential design of mixed research method. The findings of quantitative analysis integration by Chi-Square Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, and Logistics Regression analysis at BPR BKK Pekalongan Regency in 2021 will be explored further by qualitative research. Using nine variables that affect debtors' failure, this study finds that the interest rate is a variable that consistently affects the status of default loans using the integration of 3 analyses and qualitative analysis. The study results indicate that rural banks need to pay more attention to determining credit interest rates when prospective debtors apply for credit. The determination of interest rates is related to compensation for risks faced by rural banks in connection with asymmetric information about the debtor's ability to pay while considering the interest rate determined by the IDIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207